Center for America

  Updates on Business Liability Reform in the States

March 10, 2008

 

 

New White Paper from American Tort Reform Foundation:
 

Trial Lawyers, Inc. update:
Michigan on Trial

Litigation Industry Looks to Recapture the Great Lakes State
 

(Press Release Courtesy The Manhattan Institute)

New York June 17, 2008 -- New York, NY: Today, the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Legal Policy released Trial Lawyers, Inc. Update: Michigan on Trial, a report highlighting the severe threat posed by the Michigan trial bar, as they attempt to unravel years of successful reforms aimed at keeping businesses and doctors in the Great Lakes State. Following up on the success of previous Trial Lawyers, Inc. publications, this brief report exposes the efforts of the Michigan branch of America’s rapacious litigation industry.

In the mid-1980s, Michigan was a state in legal crisis, leading the state Senate to declare in 1985: “Liability has reached epidemic proportions and presents an emergency situation to the Legislature.” Trial lawyers’ control over Michigan’s legal system had led to:

  • 1,100% increase in malpractice filings from 1970 to 1984 in the large metro counties of Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb

  • Doubling of medical-malpractice insurance costs from 1980 to 1985 – with even higher increases in the riskiest specialties

  • 42% of family physicians reporting that they had ceased delivering babies or reduced the number they delivered, and even more had cut back on surgery and treating patients likely to require intensive care.

The Michigan Legislature responded admirably and effectively by instituting reforms throughout the 1990s that targeted medical malpractice, product liability, and tort law generally. Michigan quickly saw dramatic results:

  • Filings of tort lawsuits fell over 50 percent in the year after the 1995 product liability reform and they have continued to decline since.

  • Tort actions in Michigan had dropped to a third of their 1996 level, by 2005.

  • Cases proceeding to trial declined by more than 20%, within five years after the reforms, in big counties like Wayne and Oakland.

  • Medical-malpractice insurance rates in Michigan remained stable, while they soared nationwide.

  • Michigan’s largest medical-malpractice insurer of physicians cut its rates in 2008 by an average of 6.5% statewide, even for the most vulnerable specialists: by 12% for neurosurgeons, by 14% for obstetricians, and by 25% for orthopedic surgeons.

  • The reforms helped to attract new businesses and allowed Michigan to diversify away from its traditional manufacturing base. From 1999 through 2002, more biotechnology companies were started in Michigan than in any other state

But the trial lawyers have not given up their self-interested fight:

  • Trial lawyers sought to get tort reforms overturned but were rebuffed by the state Court of Appeals in 1996 and the state Supreme Court in 1999 and again in 2004.

  • Trial bar worked diligently – but unsuccessfully – to elect favored candidates to the bench by raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for candidates who would work in their financial interests

  • Having failed in the courts, the litigation industry is now working to repeal the state’s FDA-defense law and, more recently, have been trying to expand the scope of the state’s consumer protection laws, with the intent of permitting plaintiffs to win damages without meeting the basic requirements of tort law – such as the occurrence of an actual injury.

So where Should Michigan Go from Here?

Michigan’s dismal economy enhances its need for legal reform. A 6.9% unemployment rate, well above the national average, retail sales growth substantially trailing inflation, and an annualized first quarter growth rate of just 0.9 percent render the state’s legal climate remains one of its few competitive advantages – particularly given its relatively high tax rates.

If the legislature reverses course on tort reform, or the trial lawyers seize control of the state Supreme Court, the consequences for Michigan’s already ailing economy—and the residents who depend on it—would be severe.

For a copy of the report please visit: www.TrialLawyersInc.com. To speak with James Copland, the author of the report and the director of the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Legal Policy, contact Samara Klar at 646-839-3313 or sklar@manhattan-institute.org
 

##

The Manhattan Institute, a 501 (c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and
disseminate new ideas that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.
 

 

 

The Center for America is a national nonprofit coalition of leading corporations, think tanks, foundations,

 trade associations, individuals and organizations advocating for legal reform at the state level. 

  www.centerforamerica.org

Original material © 2008 Center for America.