Legal reform is gaining momentum in the South—from Mississippi, to Georgia, and
South Carolina, which is on the verge of enacting historic legal reform. Now
Florida is moving in the same direction with a
Florida Justice Reform Institute
rally this week where Governor Bush announced the legislation he will
support to improve the state’s civil justice system.
While federal efforts to change the country’s legal system have attracted much
attention this year, state-level reform is also critical in the battle to rein
in frivolous lawsuits and outlandish awards against companies that create jobs
and drive our economy.
Unfortunately, instead of improving its business climate, Florida has been on a
steady decline. South Florida has attracted a flood of asbestos cases over the
last decade, leading the American Tort Reform Association to name it as one of
America’s nine “judicial hellholes.”
Lawyers round up tens of thousands of “plaintiffs” who aren’t really sick and
file suit at the expense of the truly ill. In Palm Beach County, one circuit
judge who presides over the court’s asbestos division has questioned the
thousands of claims showing up in South Florida with no local connection. A
Miami law firm, which represents many of those asbestos plaintiffs, has been
unsuccessful in having the judge removed.
To put an end to this abuse of Florida’s legal system, Gov. Bush will ask the
legislature to limit class actions to Florida residents, tighten the criteria
for establishing a “class” of plaintiffs, give judges more authority to throw
out frivolous lawsuits, stop venue shopping, and make wrongdoers pay for their
share of fault instead of only the defendant with the deepest pockets.
That “deep pocket” syndrome hit Marianna business owner Eddie Hopkins head-on.
Hopkins was sued when a customer got involved in a traffic accident in his brand
new car that he had just bought from Hopkins’ car dealership. The other driver
died, and despite the fact that the accident was the deceased driver’s fault,
the family sued the dealership for wrongful death. Hopkins’ attorneys advised
him to settle the suit for $750,000 instead of risking a much higher jury award.
The customer, who was also listed as a defendant, didn’t have to pay anything.
The trial lawyers industry likes to paint itself as modern-day Robin Hoods, who
take from the rich and redistribute to more deserving members of society. Never
mind that Robin Hood didn’t fly in a private jet, or own mansions or private
golf courses in Sherwood Forest.
The trial lawyers industry is wealthy and powerful, and you can bet they won’t
want to lose any of the $40 billion they rake in each year. To put that amount
in perspective, consider that last season’s hurricane season cost an estimated
$42 billion in damages, much of that in Florida.
Out of the money spent on litigation in the U.S., only 46 cents of every dollar
actually goes to the plaintiffs. Recognizing that the lawyers are making out
like bandits and keeping the money for themselves, Florida voters overwhelmingly
passed an amendment last November to limit trial lawyers’ contingency fees. But
some trial attorneys have indicated they would sneak around that law and ask
prospective clients to waive their rights under the amendment. Gov. Bush
supports legislation that would put an end to the end-run around the amendment.
The irony of the Robin Hood myth is that it is the legal system itself (not the
sheriff of Nottingham) that extracts a “tort tax” of $3,380 a year from the
average American family of four. Floridians pay this in the form of higher
consumer prices, higher insurance rates, and higher health care costs.
With nearby states enacting meaningful reforms, it’s even more important for
Florida to act. It cannot afford to stand idly by while neighbors make their
states better places to live and do business.
Frivolous lawsuits clog our legal system, damage our economy, and make it more
difficult for any deserving claimants to have their day in court. Everyone loses
but the lawyers.
True tort reform in Florida will mean a more balanced civil justice system for
the state’s consumers—one that recognizes the difference between Robin Hood and
a wolf in sheep’s clothing.