American Justice Partnership

Opinions/Editorials on the Case for Legal Reform

 
 

 

Dan Pero

President

American Justice Partnership

May 4, 2007

 

As Appeared in Columbus Business First

 

Ohio Plays Politics in Paint Makers Suit

Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann's decision to sue 10 companies, including Sherwin-Williams and DuPont, on the grounds they knowingly manufactured and sold dangerous paint to Ohio citizens is an ugly blot not only on a vital state industry but on Ohio's reputation as a fair place to do business.

Any manufacturer considering whether to locate a plant in Ohio will certainly be watching this case.

Let's be clear. While Dann insists he's out to protect the public, this suit is more about politics than protection, at least when it comes to consumers. As one press report stated, "A political fight over lead-paint litigation is brewing between the state's newly elected statewide officeholders, almost all of them Democrats, and the Republican-controlled legislature."

Dann, a Democrat, is pursuing a line embraced by other state attorneys general and activists, including the personal injury lawyer industry. The objective is to sue companies that made products that were legal and considered safe by their contemporary standards, but which have since been restricted or banned.

Of course, improving public health standards is a good thing. The problem is Dann wants to apply the new standards retroactively.

Dann insists the targeted companies willfully created a "public nuisance." He claims they committed fraud and negligence and in the process injured children. But the fact is they followed the laws of the time and changed their practices when the laws changed.

As far as Ohio citizens go, if the objective is to help eradicate lead paint exposure, cranking up the litigation machine for five or 10 years is the worst route to take. If the attorney general and his supporters have their way, a vast number of Ohio buildings would be targeted. There is no telling how many businesses and people would be dragged into court or forced to close because of litigation costs.

In fact, for years personal injury lawyers have attempted to turn lead-based paint into the next asbestos - another mass tort bonanza that enriches already wealth lawyers but destroys companies while doing little to help plaintiffs. Indeed, a study released by the Pacific Research Institute, titled "Jackpot Justice," reports that more than 51,000 U.S. jobs have been lost due to asbestos-related bankruptcies alone - hardly what Ohio needs.

Prolonged litigation is music to the ears of Ohio trial lawyers who are still smarting from reforms that curbed their ability to pursue frivolous lawsuits. As someone who follows these issues, let me say that civil justice reform has been a bright story for Ohio and has made it more attractive to new businesses while helping existing businesses expand. This case could reverse that progress.

Many of our elected officials seem to forget there are more important things than pandering to powerful supporters, including personal injury lawyers whose favorite color is green. My critique of the Dann decision: Paint it black.

Columnist:

   

Dan Pero

President

American Justice Partnership

600 South Walnut

Lansing, MI 48933

517-371-7276

dperoajp@aol.com

 

 

 

 

 

Op-Ed article submissions should be made to Op-Ed@lawexec.com. All articles must include contact information for the author(s) and only signed articles will be considered for publication.

 

 

If you know of or have authored an article or report that deserves recognition among corporate and public policy leaders, please send an email to LegalReform@lawexec.com.  Original material © 2007 American Justice Partnership.