|
Liability |
|
Joint and
Several |
|
Economic
Damages |
Applies |
Matkin v. Smith,
643 So. 2d 949 (Ala. 1994).
|
|
Non-Economic
Damages |
Applies |
See
above. |
|
May a
Jury Allocate Fault Among All Persons Contributing
to an Injury? |
No
|
Springer v. Jefferson
County, 595 So. 2d 1381 (Ala. 1992) (holding
that a defendant is precluded from arguing another
tortfeasor’s negligence unless act or omission of
other tortfeasor was an intervening
cause).
|
|
Market Share
Liability |
No |
|
|
Defenses |
|
Comparative
Negligence |
No |
Contributory
negligence is a defense.
Serio v.
Merrell, Inc., 941 So. 2d 960 (Ala.
2006);
Ex parte
Goldsen, 783 So. 2d 53 (Ala.
2000).
|
|
Assumption of
Risk |
Yes |
The affirmative defense of
assumption of the risk requires that the defendant
prove (1) that the plaintiff had knowledge of, and
an appreciation of, the danger the plaintiff
faced; and (2) that the plaintiff voluntarily
consented to bear the risk posed by that
danger.
Pittman v. United Toll
Sys., LLC, 882 So. 2d 842 (Ala.
2003). |
|
Product
Misuse |
Yes |
Kelly v. M. Trigg
Enter., Inc., 605 So. 2d 1185 (Ala. 1992);
Banner Welders, Inc. v. Knighton, 425 So.
2d 441 (Ala. 1982). |
|
Compliance
With Government
Standards |
No |
Evidence of compliance
with standards is admissible as to whether a
product is defective, but is not a complete
defense.
General Motors Corp. v.
Jernigan, 883 So. 2d 646 (Ala. 2006);
General Motors Corp. v. Edwards, 482
So. 2d 1176 (Ala. 1985).
|
|
Statute
of Repose |
None |
A former provision of
the Ala. Code, § 6-5-502, was held
unconstitutional in Lankford v. Sullivan, Long
& Hagerty, 416 So. 2d 996 (Ala.
1982).
|
|
Government
Contractor
Defense |
Yes, but unclear as to
whether it the defense is available beyond
military equipment |
Compare Pietz v.
Orthopedic Equip. Co., 562 So. 2d 152 (Ala.
1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990)
(military equipment only) with Hanks v.
Courtesy Ford Sales, Inc., 574 So. 2d 731
(Ala. 1990) (involving dump truck); see also
Burgess v. Colorado Serum Co., 772 F.2d 844
(11th Cir. 1985) (finding that Alabama would not
extend the government contractor defense beyond
military equipment).
|
|
McLawsuits
Permitted?
Can a food manufacturer,
distributor, seller, or retailer be sued based on
an individual's weight gain, obesity, or
obesity-related health
condition? |
No
restriction |
|
|
Compensatory
Damages |
|
Is there a statutory limit
on economic damages? |
No |
Alabama enacted a $400,000
limit on non-economic damages awards and a $1
million total limit on medical malpractice awards;
these statutes were declared unconstitutional in
Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'n, 592 So. 2d
156 (Ala. 1991), and Smith v. Schulte, 671
So. 2d 1334 (Ala.), cert. denied, 517 U.S.
1220 (1996). But see Ex parte
Apicella, 809 So. 2d 865 (Ala. 2001), cert.
denied, 534 U.S. 1086 (2002) (holding that
right to jury trial under the Alabama Constitution
does not restrict the Legislature from removing
from the jury the unbridled right to punish)
(overruling Smith v. Schulte); Mobile
Infirmary Med. Center v. Hodgen, 884 So. 2d
801 (Ala. 2003) (noting erosion of
support for the Moore decision but
declining to revisit the opinion because the
Legislature had, subsequent to Moore,
chosen to enact a new law capping punitive damages
rather than adopt limits on both non-economic and
punitive damages awards).
|
|
Is there a statutory limit
on non-economic damages? |
No |
|
|
Is recovery for
medical monitoring permitted without physical
injury? |
No |
Hinton v. Monsanto,
813 So. 2d 827 (Ala. 2001)
(refusing to allow cause of action for monitoring
when plaintiff could not show medical present
injury).
|
|
Punitive
Damages |
|
Is there a statutory
limit? |
Yes |
In nonphysical injury
cases against larger businesses: limited to
greater of three times compensatory damages or
$500,000; in nonphysical injury cases against
small businesses with a net worth of less than $2
million: limited to $50,000 or 10% of net
worth up to $200,000; in personal injury
cases: limited to the greater of three times
compensatory damages or $1.5 million. Limits
are adjusted at three-year intervals from January
1, 2003 in
accordance with the Consumer Price
Index.
Ala. Code §
6-11-21.
|
|
Is there any restriction
on imposing
multiple punitive damage awards for same
conduct? |
No |
|
|
Does the state receive a
portion of the punitive damage
award? |
No |
|
|
What standard is
used? |
Clear and convince
evidence |
Ala. Code
§ 6-11-20. |
|
Procedures |
|
Venue |
|
|
|
Conducive to Abuse
- Does the statute permit forum
shopping? |
No |
Civil actions against
corporations may be brought in either the county
where a substantial part of the events or
omissions giving rise to the claim occurred or
real property that is the subject of a claim is
located; the county of the corporation's principal
office in Alabama; or the country in which the
plaintiff resides, or if the plaintiff is not an
individual, where the plaintiff had its principal
place of business when the cause of action
accrued, if the corporation does business by agent
in the county where the plaintiff resides. If none
of the above apply, a civil action may be brought
in any county in which the corporation was doing
business by agent at the time of the accrual of
the cause of action.
Ala. Code §
6-3-7.
For actions arising
outside of Alabama, if the defendant shows that
"there exists a more appropriate forum" outside of
Alabama, "taking into account the location where
the acts giving rise to the action occurred, the
convenience of the parties and witnesses, and the
interests of justice, the court must dismiss the
action without prejudice," the court may require
the defendant to file with the court a consent to
submit to the jurisdiction of the alternate forum,
and consent to waive a defense based on statute of
limitations, if the case is filed in a new forum
within 60 days of dismissal.
Ala. Code §
6-5-430.
|
|
Class
Actions |
|
|
|
Is there a right to an
immediate appeal of class
certification? |
Yes |
A court's order
certifying a class or refusing to certify a class
is appealable in the same manner as a final order
to the appellate court which would have had
jurisdiction over the appeal from a final order in
the action. The appeal must be filed
within 42 days of the order certifying or refusing
the class. The actions of the trial court
are then stayed during the pending of
appeal.
Ala. Code
§ 6-5-642.
|
|
Appeal
Bonds |
|
|
|
Does the amount of the
required bond place undue pressure on the
defendant to settle rather than
appeal? |
Yes |
The required bond is
twice the amount of the judgment in any civil
appeal.
Ala. Code §
12-12-73. |
|
Is there a cap to
appeal bonds in certain, very limited
instances? |
Yes |
In civil
litigation under any legal theory involving a
signatory, a successor of a signatory, or an
affiliate of a signatory to the tobacco Master
Settlement Agreement, the total supersedeas
bond that is required of all appellants
collectively shall not exceed $125 million,
regardless of the amount of the
judgment.
Ala. Code §
6-12-4.
|
|
Evidence |
|
Has the
state adopted Daubert, which
requires the judge to act as a "gatekeeper"
against unreliable expert
testimony in civil actions? |
No |
Martin v. Dyas,
896 So. 2d 436 (Ala. 2004). |
|
Private Lawsuits Under Consumer
Protection Statutes |
|
Must each individual
plaintiff show that he or she relied on the
allegedly unfair or deceptive practice at
issue? |
Defendant’s acts must
cause monetary damage |
Ala. Code § 8-19-10(a). |
|
What is the level of
scienter (intent) required of a
defendant? |
Not
provided |
|
|
Are class actions
permitted? |
No |
Ala. Code § 8-19-10(f). |
|
Are statutory damages (an
amount set by statute) provided for even if a
plaintiff cannot show an actual economic
injury? |
Yes |
Provides for award of the
greater of actual damages or
$100.
Ala. Code §
8-19-10(a)(1). |
|
Does the plaintiff
automatically receive treble (triple) damages
regardless of the intent of the
defendant? |
No |
Up to three times any actual
damage, in the court's discretion. Ala. Code §
8-19-10(a)(2). |
|
Does every prevailing
plaintiff receive attorneys' fees and
costs? |
Yes |
On a finding by the court
that an action or counterclaim was frivolous or
brought in bad faith or for the purpose of
harassment, the court shall award to the defendant
reasonable attorney's fees and
costs.
Ala. Code §
8-19-10(a)(3).
|
|
Is conduct authorized by
or in compliance with a state or federal statute
or regulation exempt from the
act? |
No
|
The Alabama statute
does not specifically exempt acts or transactions
in compliance with the regulations of an
administrative agency. It does, however,
include a statement indicating that due
consideration and weight shall be given to the
legal interpretations of the Federal Trade
Commission and the federal courts relating to §
(5)(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Ala. Code
§
8-19-6.
|
|
Jury Service |
|
Automatic exemptions and
disqualifications based on occupation
eliminated? |
Yes |
|
|
Are the grounds for
obtaining an excuse from service closely
defined? |
Yes |
"Undue or extreme physical or
financial hardship" is limited to when an
individual would: (1) be required to abandon a
person under his or her personal care or
supervision due to the impossibility of
obtaining an appropriate substitute caregiver;
(2) incur costs that would have a substantial
adverse impact on the payment of the
individual's necessary daily living expenses or
on those for whom he or she provides the
principal means of support; or (3) suffer
physical hardship that would result in illness
or disease." Undue or extreme physical or
financial hardship does not exist solely
based on the fact that a prospective juror will be
required to be absent from his or her place of
employment.
Ala. Code §
12-16-63(b).
|
|
May jurors automatically
postpone and reschedule
service? |
Yes |
Jurors have the right to
one automatic postponement with a simple and
convenient method of rescheduling jury service to
a more convenient time within six
months.
Ala. Code §
§12-16-63.1.
|
|
Is a juror's employment
and leave time adequately protected during
service? |
Yes |
An employer may not
discharge or take any adverse employment action
against an employee solely because the person
serves on a jury. Employers may not require
an employee to use annual, vacation, or sick leave
time for the period in which an employee serves on
a jury.
Ala. Code § 12-16-8(b),
12-16-8.1(a).
|
|
Is there a limit on the
frequency of jury service? |
Yes |
Individuals may not be
required to serve more than once every two
years.
Ala. Code
§12-16-75(b).
|
|
Is the length of service
limited to no more than one day or one
trial? |
No |
Jurors are generally
summoned to serve for one week.
Ala. Code §
12-16-70.
|
|
Juror per
diem |
N/A |
Employers are required to
compensate full-time employees during jury
service.
Ala. Code §
12-16-8(c).
|
|
Is additional compensation
available on lengthy trials? |
N/A |
See
above. |
|
Is the potential penalty
for nonappearance sufficient to encourage
participation? |
Yes |
Fine of up to $300 and/or
imprisonment no more than 10 days.
Ala. Code
§ 12-16-82. |
|
Problem
Jurisdictions |
|
Montgomery and Macon
Counties |
|
Named as Judicial
Hellholes by
the American Tort Reform Association.
|