|
Liability |
|
Joint and
Several |
|
Economic
Damages |
Modified |
Joint liability has
been abolished, except in concert of action
cases. If the trial court finds that any
defendant's share will not be "reasonably
collectible," the remaining defendants' shares
shall be adjusted as follows: if a defendant is
found to be more than 10% but less than 50% at
fault, the court may increase that party's
proportionate share up to 10 percentage points;
if a defendant is found to be more than 50% at
fault, the court may increase that party's
proportionate share up to 20 percentage points.
Ark. Code Ann. §§
16-55-201, 16-55-203.
|
|
Non-Economic
Damages |
Modified |
See
above. |
|
May a
Jury Allocate Fault Among All Persons Contributing
to an Injury? |
No
|
The Arkansas Supreme Court
held the section of the Civil Justice Reform Act
of 2003 permitting allocation of fault to
nonparties (Ark. Code Ann.
§
16-55-202)
unconstitutional in Johnson v.
Rockwell Automation, Inc., 2009 WL 1218362
(Ark., Apr. 30, 2009).
|
|
Market Share
Liability |
No |
Jackson v. Anchor
Packing Co., 994 F.2d 1295 (8th Cir.
1993).
|
|
Defenses |
|
Comparative
Negligence |
Yes,
modified |
If the plaintiff's fault
is less than the fault of
the party or parties from whom the plaintiff seeks
to recover damages, then the plaintiff is entitled
to recover the amount of his damages after they
have been diminished in proportion to the degree
of his or her own fault.
Ark. Code Ann. §
16-64-122(b).
|
|
Assumption
of Risk |
No |
The Arkansas Supreme Court
determined in Dawson v. Fulton, 745 S.W.2d
617 (Ark. 1988), that following adoption of comparative
negligence, assumption of the risk is no longer
applicable in Arkansas as a separate theory;
see also Ouachita Wilderness Inst., Inc. v.
Mergen, 947 S.W.2d 780 (Ark.
1997).
|
|
Product
Misuse |
Uncertain |
|
|
Compliance
With
Government
Standards |
No |
Compliance with standards
is admissible as evidence that a product was not
defective, but is not a complete
defense.
Ark. Code Ann.
§ 16-116-105(a).
|
|
Statute
of Repose |
In
some cases |
Use of a product
beyond its anticipated life by a consumer where
the consumer knew or should have known the
anticipated life of the product. Such use
may be considered as evidence of fault on the part
of the consumer.
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-116-105(c).
|
|
Government
Contractor
Defense |
In some
cases |
A contractor who performs
work in accordance with a government contract
under the direct supervision of the agency, is not
liable unless it is negligent in performing under
the contract.
Smith v. Rogers Group,
Inc., 72 S.W.3d 450 (Ark.
2002).
|
|
McLawsuits
Permitted?
Can a food manufacturer,
distributor, seller, or retailer be sued based on
an individual's weight gain, obesity, or
obesity-related health
condition? |
No
restriction |
|
|
Compensatory
Damages |
|
Is there a statutory limit
on economic damages? |
No |
Ark. Code Ann.
§ 16-55-212(a).
|
|
Is there a statutory limit
on non-economic damages? |
No |
See
above. |
|
Is recovery for
medical monitoring permitted without physical
injury? |
Uncertain |
Baker v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Div.,
992 S.W.2d 797, 798 n.2 (Ark. 1999) (class
certification improper in action where
plaintiffs agreed to treat medical monitoring as
type of damages instead of separate cause of
action); see also In re Pempro, 230
F.R.D. 555, 569 (E.D. Ark. 2005) ("Arkansas has
rejected medical monitoring as a cause of
action, and questions its availability as a
remedy.").
|
|
Punitive
Damages |
|
Is there a statutory
limit? |
Yes |
Punitive damages are
limited to $250,000 or three times compensatory
damages, not to exceed $1 million. The
limits are to be adjusted for inflation every
three years beginning January 1,
2006.
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-208.
A constitutional challenge was
pending at the time of this publication.
See Beverly Enterp., Inc., v. Reaton,
No. 08-834 (Ark., Feb. 12, 2009) (appeal
transferred to Arkansas Supreme Court on
motion).
|
|
Is there any restriction
on imposing multiple punitive damage awards for
same conduct? |
No |
|
|
Does the state receive a
portion of the punitive damage
award? |
No |
|
|
What standard is
used? |
Clear and convincing
evidence |
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-207. |
|
Procedures |
|
Venue |
|
|
|
Conducive to Abuse
- Does the statute permit forum
shopping? |
Unreported |
Actions against domestic
corporations and foreign corporations that qualify
to do business in Arkansas "may be brought in the
county in which it is situated or has its
principal office or place of business, or in which
its chief officer resides."
Ark. Code Ann. §
16-60-104; Cavette v. Ford Motor Credit
Co., 545 S.W.2d 612 (Ark. 1977).
Plaintiffs may bring
lawsuits against foreign corporations not
registered to do business in Arkansas "in any
county in which there may be property of or debts
owing to the defendant."
Ark. Code Ann. §
16-60-108.
In personal injury actions
"where the accident which caused the injury or
death occurred outside this state, shall be
brought in the county in this state where the
person injured or killed resided at the time of
injury or in any county in which the defendant, or
one (1) of several defendants, resides or is
summoned."
Ark. Code Ann. §
16-60-112(c); Forest City Mach. Works Inc. v.
Colvin, 521 S.W.2d 206 (Ark.
1975).
When a court finds that,
in the interest of substantial justice, the action
should be heard in another forum, the court may
stay or dismiss the action in whole or in part on
any conditions that may be just.
Ark. Code Ann. §
16-4-101(D); Life of Am. Ins. Co. v.
Baker-Lowe-Fox Ins. Marketing, Inc., 873 S. W.
2d 537 (Ark. 1994).
|
|
Class
Actions |
|
|
|
Is there a right to an
immediate appeal of class
certification? |
Yes |
Ark. R. App. Proc.
2(a)(9). |
|
Appeal
Bonds |
|
|
|
Does the amount of the
required bond place undue pressure on the
defendant to settle rather than
appeal? |
No |
The maximum appeal
bond that may be required in any civil action
under any legal theory is limited to $25 million,
regardless of the amount of the
judgment.
Ark Code Ann. §
16-55-214.
|
|
Evidence |
|
Has the
state adopted Daubert, which
requires the judge to act as a "gatekeeper"
against unreliable expert
testimony in civil actions? |
Yes |
Farm
Bur. Mut. Ins.
Co. v. Foote, 14 S.W.3d 512 (Ark.
2000). |
|
Private Lawsuits Under Consumer
Protection Statutes |
|
Must each individual
plaintiff show that he or she relied on the
allegedly unfair or deceptive practice at
issue? |
Causation |
A plaintiff must suffer
actual damage or injury as a result of violation
of Act.
Ark. Code Ann. §
4-88-113(f). |
|
What is the level of
scienter (intent) required of a
defendant? |
Not
addressed |
|
|
Are class actions
permitted? |
Yes |
|
|
Are statutory damages (an
amount set by statute) provided for even if a
plaintiff cannot show an actual economic
injury? |
No |
Actual damages only.
Ark. Code Ann.
§§
4-88-113(f). |
|
Does the plaintiff
automatically receive treble (triple) damages
regardless of the intent of the
defendant? |
No |
Elderly or disabled
individuals may recover punitive damages, in
addition to actual damages.
Ark Code Ann.
§ 4-88-204. |
|
Does every prevailing
plaintiff receive attorneys' fees and
costs? |
Yes |
Ark. Code Ann.
§
4-88-113(f). |
|
Is conduct authorized by
or in compliance with a state or federal statute
or regulation exempt from the
act? |
Yes
|
“This chapter does not
apply to: (1) Advertising or practices which are
subject to and which comply with any rule, order,
or statute administered by the Federal Trade
Commission….”
Ark. Code Ann.
§
4-88-101(1).
|
|
Jury Service |
|
Automatic exemptions and
disqualifications based on occupation
eliminated? |
Yes |
|
|
Are the grounds for
obtaining an excuse from service closely
defined? |
No |
A person may be
excused from jury service “when the state of his
health or that of his family reasonably requires
his absence, or when, for any reason, his own
interests or those of the public will, in the
opinion of the court, be materially injured by his
attendance.”
Ark. Code Ann. §
16-31-103.
|
|
May jurors automatically
postpone and reschedule
service? |
No |
|
|
Is a juror's employment
and leave time adequately protected during
service? |
Yes |
An employer may not
subject an employee to discharge, loss of sick
leave, loss of vacation time, or any form of
penalty on account of his or her absence from
employment by reason of jury duty, if the employee
gave the employer reasonable notice of the jury
service obligation. Violation is a Class A
misdemeanor.
Ark. Code Ann.
§
16-31-106.
|
|
Is there a limit on the
frequency of jury service? |
Yes |
Citizens are required
to serve no more than once every two
years.
Ark. Code Ann.
§
16-31-104(a).
|
|
Is the length of service
limited to no more than one day or one
trial? |
No |
No petit juror
shall be required to report for jury duty on more
than 10 days or for more than a 4-month
period.
Ark. Code Ann.
§ 16-31-104.
|
|
Juror per
diem |
$15-50 |
Compensation is
set at $50 each day for persons selected and
seated as members of a grand jury or petit
jury. If an eligible person is excused or
otherwise not selected and seated as a juror,
compensation is not less than $15 each
day.
Ark. Code Ann.
§
16-34-103.
|
|
Is additional compensation
available on lengthy trials? |
No |
|
|
Is the potential penalty
for nonappearance sufficient to encourage
participation? |
No |
A person who fails to
respond to a summons may be fined not less than $5
nor more than $500, and may be held in contempt of
court.
Ark. Code Ann.
§ 16-32-106(d).
|
|
Problem
Jurisdictions |
|
None
reported |
|
|