State Liability Reform Briefing for CEOs:

The Democrats in Michigan Want Cliff Taylor’s Job

In this column, Dan Pero provides insights about the political, legislative and judicial dynamics at the state level that shape the liability environment for employers.

 

Send this page to a friend! (click here)

Cliff Taylor stands squarely in the crosshairs of a campaign aimed by the Michigan Democratic Party to defeat his 2008 reelection bid.  To encourage unbridled judicial activism, they will spend millions to prevent Chief Justice Taylor from keeping his seat on the Michigan Supreme Court.   As a rule-of-law justice and candidate, Taylor is the only obstacle between the plaintiff’s bar and their decade-long quest to control the Court and overturn liability reform laws enacted during Gov. John Engler’s three terms in office.

By Dan Pero

President,

American Justice Partnership

Ultimately, Chief Justice Taylor’s defeat could cost job-providers in Michigan billions, and the damage won’t stop there.  Another activist seat on the Michigan Supreme Court would open the door for voracious plaintiff’s lawyers eager to plunder companies in a more liberal liability environment, an environment where judges, not legislators make the laws.

In the 2006 elections, thanks to multi-million dollar contributions by the Stryker family, the Democrats won control of the Michigan House and nearly won control of the Senate, missing a majority by just one seat.  As quid pro quo to their plaintiff bar supporters, Democrats in the Michigan legislature launched another major effort this year to repeal Michigan’s Drug Shield Law and missed doing so only because a conservative State Senate, under the leadership of Senators Mike Bishop and Wayne Kuipers, stopped them.   The current law gives pharmaceutical companies liability immunity so long as their drugs or devices were approved by the FDA and no fraud was involved in their license application; a repeal would enable plaintiffs lawyers to file cases they have been stockpiling for years.

Chief Justice Cliff Taylor

The plaintiff’s  bar will work tirelessly in 2008 to repeal this and other key elements of Gov. Engler’s legal reform legacy -- the same legacy which has reduced by thousands the number of unwarranted product liability lawsuits filed each year in Michigan.  But remember, the Republican majority in the Senate is holding out against liability reform repeals by a very slim margin. And, if unsuccessful at repeal in the legislature, the trial lawyers will turn their full focus to the Supreme Court hoping to elect a justice who is only too happy to make, rather than interpret, Michigan’s laws.

Contributing to the significance and visibility of year’s Supreme Court race so significant and so visible is the fact that most statewide offices are not up for election again until 2010, including governor, attorney general, secretary of state and the Michigan Senate.  This leaves Taylor’s Supreme Court Seat as the highest statewide seat open next year.  Further, it is a year when only one Supreme Court seat is up.  Taylor, and the principles he stands for, will be a very visible symbol for both the plaintiff-activist coalition on the left and the rule-of-law coalition on the right.  Even now, months before they pick his election opponent, Democrats have signaled their interest in the race and are engaging in coordinated, ongoing criticism of Taylor’s distinctive 10 year record to undermine voter confidence in him.

In short, the 2008 Michigan Supreme Court will be one of the most important state races in the country for the business community and rule-of-law advocates. A loss for Taylor would create a never-ending succession of court challenges to Engler’s successful reform legislation.  An activist Supreme Court in Michigan would open the door for billions in new litigation against business – just look at the damage done by activist Supreme Courts in West Virginia and Florida, two of the most pro-plaintiff Courts in the country.

Every CEO with operations in Michigan should make sure that employees understand that Cliff Taylor’s reelection to the Supreme Court is essential to maintaining the type of fair legal climate in which companies can retain and expand jobs. Taylor needs the support of rule-of-law advocates starting now.

 

Read More on Cliff Taylor and the Michigan Supreme Court:

Mike Gizzi, the Human Events columnist who writes Gizzi on Politics, has also written about the importance of Taylor's candidacy.  Click Here

 

About Dan Pero: 

In his role as AJP president, Dan Pero works with state and national liability reform partners around the country.  His assessment of the political, judicial and legislative dynamics in each state reflects discussions with state leaders, political analysts and journalists who cover business and legal issues in the states.  Pero served as campaign manager and then Chief of Staff for Governor John Engler in Michigan.  Contact Dan at 517-371-7276 or DPero@AJP-mail.org

AJP is actively involved in the states building an overall political environment on the issue of legal reform.  AJP’s primary role is to create a climate in each state that allows reform-minded candidates and campaigns  to be successful.  AJP is committed to raising the profile of legal reform and judicial restraint to insure that citizens are educated and aware of the importance of legal reform when making choices about which candidates for office they will support.  Where legally permissible, AJP provides support to candidates or campaigns – but generally speaking, AJP’s role is focused on issue advocacy and public education.  Original material © 2007 American Justice Partnership, 600 South Walnut, Lansing, MI  48933.  Dan Pero, President. Contact  AJP