|
Impact on
Municipalities
Municipalities are
named in lawsuits for a wide variety of claims: sidewalks with
cracks, streets with potholes, hospitals where fatal mistakes
can be made, schools where children can be injured, and parks
where toddlers can fall, among many other examples.
-
U.S.
Conference of Mayors Tort Reform Resolution:
The problem has become so great in cities like New York and
Chicago that the U.S. Conference of Mayors adopted a
Resolution at its June 2004 annual meeting calling for
Congress to “enact tort reform legislation directing the
judicial system to emphasize appropriate compensation for
victims in actions against municipalities.” According to
the Resolution, which was proposed by the City of Chicago,
“resources that cities must devote to frivolous tort
litigation and tort settlements and judgments could
otherwise be made available for other important public
purposes, and ultimately, the costs of such tort settlements
and judgments are generally borne by local taxpayers.”
The New York City
Experience
New York City
provides the starkest example of this problem. As the New
York Times wrote in May 2002, we live in “a legal climate in
which the city is seen as an easy mark and a deep pocket”:
-
From 1978
to 2003, there was a 2,500% increase in tort payouts.
According to a July 16, 2003 press release published by
Mayor Bloomberg, during the previous three years, New York
City paid more than $189 million in judgments as a result of
actions brought for damages caused by sidewalk defects and
falls on snow and ice. In 2003, New York City enacted
legislation explicitly transferring liability for such suits
to property owners, who are responsible for the maintenance
of sidewalks, to maintain insurance policies to cover their
liability for sidewalk accidents.
PDF of news release
-
In 2003, tort
suits cost NYC taxpayers more than $500 million.
-
The New York
State Trial Lawyers Association, in 1982 formed the “Big
Apple Sidewalk and Pothole Protection Committee.” This
Committee surveys all sidewalk cracks and potholes in NYC
and sends to NYC officials maps with squiggles where each
lies. In 2001, for example, the Committee noted 700,000
cracks/potholes, thereby putting the City on notice should
an accident happen at one of those locations. Thus, just by
receiving the maps, the city becomes liable if someone is
injured by tripping over the crack or driving over the
pothole. In 1999, the City paid out $57 million for 2,800
sidewalk slips.
-
Example: In 1992,
two brothers in their late 20s recklessly dove off a 10-foot
high, fenced pier at Coney Island and experienced broken
necks. They were awarded $104 million, $75 million of which
was for pain and suffering. The awards were later reduced,
but the city was still on the hook for $19 million each.
Increasing
Jury Awards
Against Public Entities
According to Jury
Verdict Research Series, which conducted its study in 1999, the
median jury award for government negligence claims was highest
in suits against state governments when compared to negligence
claims against other government bodies. The median jury award
against state governments was $437,652.
The study also looked
at median jury awards for government negligence cases in various
categories, including:
-
$422,939 for
roads and bridges liability
-
$318,000 in the
public services category
-
$214,500 in the
township/boroughs category, and
-
$100,000 against
federal government, city government and county government.
The study also showed
that the most frequently claimed injury was “emotional
distress,” at 26 percent of the total number of plaintiff
verdicts. It also took more than 40 months for the claims that
went to trial to be resolved. The only positive news is that
the number of cases where punitive damage awards were given have
been decreasing.
-
In 1998, only 10
percent of the cases included punitive damages, where in
1996 it was 18 percent and in 1993 it was 15 percent.
-
The median
punitive award also went down from $150,000 in 1992 to
$10,250 in 1998.
School Tort Liability
Another area where
tort costs have skyrocketed is in public schools. According to
a 1999 joint study by the American Tort Reform Association and
the National School Boards Association:
-
64% of school
principals surveyed said they changed school-related
activities because of liability concerns.
-
20% said they
spend 5-10 hours a week on liability avoidance issues.
-
25% said they
faced lawsuits in the past two years.
Other Examples of
Expanding Liability Problems for Schools
-
The St.
Petersburg Times reported that the local Pinellas County
School Board had a $1.3 million legal bill in 2003. Because
of all the suits filed against the School Board, it was
forced to send cases to outside firms specializing in
negligence, workers’ compensation and environmental claims.
Said School Board attorney John Bowen: “The school system is
a big target . . . Attorneys see it as a big pocket to go
after.”
-
In fact, parents
who want to volunteer at their kids’ schools are facing the
expense of $100 background checks and new “rigorous security
policies” in a growing number of school districts. As the
New York Times reported, in the post 9/11 world, schools
do not want to be liable for “failure to screen,” which is
how the trial lawyers would go after the school districts if
a volunteer engaged in criminal activity.
-
Parents in Oak
Park, Illinois filed a purported class action in October
2003 against the local school board saying that the new
wireless network the school put into the classrooms somehow
threatens the health of the students. This is akin to the
cell phone suits, which have been largely discredited given
modern technology.
|
Solutions for
Municipalities
Among the
traditional tort reforms, the two most mentioned for
municipalities would be ending joint and several
liability and allowing for offsets from collateral
sources. For example, according to City Corporate
Counsel Michael Cardozo, collateral source offsets
would save New York City $130 million per year.
Also, municipal suits could be heard in a special
Court of Claims, such as the one that hears suits
against some states, where the trier of fact in the
Court of Claims is a specialized judge. The State
of New York, for example, has a Court of Claims and
paid out only $32.6 million in total tort costs in
2003.
|
Lawsuit Abuse Costs Contents
|
Previous
Page |
Next Page
|